Materials Scientist Offers Bizarre Sounding Explanation for 9/11 WTC Collapse; Says Official Theory Misses Key Facts - Part 4 of 4

Structural engineer and materials scientist Judy Wood says the two leading theories of the World Trade Center's Destruction on 9/11 fail to fit key facts. Neither the official theory (airplane impact and fire did it) nor the leading alternative "conspiracy" theory (controlled demolition did it) explain key evidence that she presents.

This evidence includes --

- Destruction of several WTC buildings not hit by airplanes or significant debris.

- Extreme dustification versus evidence of collapse.

- Paper unburned near heavy metalic objects, such as cars and trucks, with destruction like that caused by fire or extreme heat.

- Cars and trucks destroyed in strange ways, inconsistent with heat damage or impact: for example,engine blocks and door handles "melted away" with body areas intact on the same vehicle.

- Seismic readings much fainter than would be expected from the towers' debris hitting the earth.

Only a new theory can explain the odd collection of facts, she claims. However, the one she presents seems incredible and has disturbing implications.

Dr. Judy D. Wood is a mechanical engineer with a Ph.D. in Materials Engineering Science from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.

  • Currently 5/5 stars.

Views: 122


You need to be a member of SuperLife to add comments!

Join SuperLife

Comment by Dick Samson on June 15, 2008 at 2:45pm
Michael, would be great if you have time to post the Jesse Ventura video.
Comment by Michael Evans on June 15, 2008 at 2:37pm
Dr. Wood's presentation is fascinating, but her theory about the use of some kind of star war's type of microwave device is far-fetched and contradicts her observation that only explosions could produce the outward movement of walls, debris and the right angle bending of steel girders.

Dr. Wood has more information here:

I really like the Jesse Ventura video which shows the collapse of the third building which can leave no doubt that the official explanation is completely suspect. It seems to me that well-placed C-4 explosives seem to offer the best explanation for the downing of all three buildings.

The big question still is what happened to all the enormous amount of steel from the downed structures?

Why Sign Up? See video:

Sign Up to join or form next-level groups:

Links to Member Content

Groups | Videos | Blogs
Forum | Photos

Sign Up to post content.

Sponsored Links


© 2021   Created by Dick Samson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service